A 2 way radio Headset Pair Is For Everyone Everybody Every person Absolutely everyone

0

Wow. The newest communication device big mac is spectacular. I mean it’s just so gorgeous so highly developed. I pity those who grew up without the 2 way radio base station.

A walkie talkie headset is perfect for mother and father who just take treatment of their youngsters that are so energetic.nIt is important for most of them to get in contact with their sons and daughters to anywhere spot they go. So, a walkie talkie headset can do the occupation for them. For the widespread individuals, it will just be effortless to use due to the fact a good deal of these merchandise are palms-free and just require a person to discuss.nWell, speaking isn’t that challenging and it could be fun way too relying on the discussion. It suits a lot of circumstances and occurrences in a person’s daily daily life. Also, it is light-weight in conditions of a bodyweight that is cozy to carry.nnSince a walkie talkie headset is made from flexible components, it can instantly fit the a single who is likely to dress in it. Aside from that, it is easily adjustable for the entry of mouth and ears. For those who do not know, they have diverse ranges that are quite extended ample for an successful distant interaction.nOne instance is about unexpected incidents. If the individual who experiences the incident has the walkie talkie headset with him or her, then rescue functions might be less difficult. It can be useful through mountain mountaineering in which accidents are well known with substantial distances. Well, it is constantly amenable to just use a radio headset for playing with kids. 1 case in point would be that of conceal and seek. Most of the time problems happen simply because a lot of younger people get dropped or incidentally get wounded. In these situations, a headset would be helpful adequate to avoid this sort of ordeals or just relieve the frequent difficulty about spot video games.nApparently, the sole objective of these headsets is unclear right now simply because a single could genuinely use them in a assortment of creative approaches. The likelihood for conversation paved a way for more interactive studying rather than just chatting secure with any person. So, if there is a opportunity to get one, then you may as nicely grab the prospect for it will be genuinely satisfying to use the walkie talkie headset in excess of and over again.nnTony McGuigano is the owner of the Walkie Talkie Headset website, as properly as a web site called Scalp Psoriasis Treatment.

Advertisements

0

I do not know if you came here as you read it on social media, twitter, facebook, google +, stumble upon or anywhere else. But thank you for coming and I hope you like reading this as much as I did.

2 way radio termsIn the San Francisco Bay Area, Sheriff Warren Rupf of Contra Costa County and Sheriff Charlie Plummer of Alameda County were political powerhouses locked in a duel of one-upmanship.

When Rupf set up a marine patrol, Plummer started buying boats. They echoed each other with helicopters, SWAT teams, and on it went.

But in 2005, amid a federal push to avoid another communications nightmare like the one blamed for the Sept. 11, 2001, deaths of 125 New York firefighters at the collapsed World Trade Center, Rupf and Plummer joined forces. They set their sights on a new digital Motorola 2 way radio system so that all their first responders could talk to each other.

There was a catch.

A notice circulated by Alameda County to gauge vendors interest in the project said the first $5.7?million phase must include a master controller made by Motorola, and the equipment must connect with the countys aging, proprietary Motorola SmartNet II system.

In other words, it was already a done deal. … Nobody else could make their equipment compatible with soon-to-be-obsolete Motorola equipment nobody except Motorola, said Steve Overacker, Contra Costa Countys telecommunications manager at the time.

Chalk up another contract win for the Schaumburg, Ill., company that for decades has ruled a market financed entirely by taxpayers and now totaling billions of dollars a year. For Motorola Solutions, as it has been known since 2011, the value of this California contract would snowball toward $100 million.

Such outcomes have come to be expected for the company that has long led the way in two-way radio technology, even as the nation went on a post-9/11 spending binge on emergency communication. Motorola has secured an estimated 80 percent of all the emergency telecommunications business in America.

Government officials across the U.S. have handed it noncompetitive contracts, used modifications of years-old contracts to buy new systems or crafted bid specifications to Motorolas advantage. These officials have helped stunt price competition and saddled taxpayers with hundreds of millions in added costs.

The companys contract wins have been clouded by irregularities or allegations of government favoritism in Chicago, Dallas and the Bay Area, and on statewide systems in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas and Washington.

Kansas officials bypassed state competitive bidding requirements in 2005 with an unusual modification of a 1991 contract with Motorola, one providing for a $50 million digital system. State officials defended their action by saying competitive bids were taken on the original system 14 years earlier.

In Chicago, Motorolas backyard, city officials justified a noncompetitive, $23 million contract on grounds it would protect a $2 million investment in proprietary Motorola equipment, when the equipments actual value was $350,000, the citys inspector general found.

Between 2009 and 2011, Iowa issued five solicitations for radio bid prices that each favored Motorola, one requiring that two knobs on the radios be exactly 19 millimeters apart a parameter fitting only a Motorola radio, The Des Moines Register first reported.

In Dallas, where Motorola has won a contract for a new digital network, the company has been snarled in controversy twice in recent years over the way its met city requirements for use of minority subcontractors, because most of the money flowed back to Motorola. City officials declined to release contract documents, forwarding a Justice Department letter stating that to do so would interfere with an FBI inquiry into possible public corruption, tax evasion and money laundering.

Washington state piggybacked on a Department of Justice contract that was not competitively bid in fall 2011 to save money. The state issued a $26 million contract and bought nearly 2,000 radios for the State Patrol.

Motorola has cultivated cozy relationships with police and fire chiefs, its biggest customers, donating more than $25 million to public safety-related foundations over the last six years, and bankrolling a key public safety coalition to which police and fire chiefs belong. Motorola sales representatives also coach public safety agencies in how to secure federal funds.

Governments have paid as much as $7,500 apiece for two-way Motorola models, when some competitors offered products for a fraction of its prices.

While our public-safety people do an extraordinary job in protecting the public, I am not impressed with the choices theyve made relative to technology, said Democratic Rep. Anna Eshoo of California, who represents part of Silicon Valley and has for years monitored Motorolas dominance with chagrin.

Motorola Solutions declined to make CEO Gregory Brown available to interview. Instead, Motorola issued a statement saying it has developed state-of-the-art technology to support the challenging and demanding missions of public safety for more than 80 years.

Customers choose Motorola because we have remained committed to serving these dedicated professionals by closely listening to them and responding with innovative solutions that meet their needs, it said.

Work together

Motorolas long-standing marketing of proprietary features has clashed with the national goal of interoperability. It got so bad that fire commanders in some cities carried multiple two Way Radios to multi-alarm blazes to ensure they could talk with every unit dispatched to the scene.

John Powell, a former chairman of a National Public Safety Telecommunications Council panel on the subject, said that even today weve got these systems going in with federal grant dollars that are really being a detriment to interoperability, because they dont comply with Homeland Security guidelines dating to 2006 that require recipients to buy radios that meet uniform design standards.

Powell criticized federal agencies for failing to put enough teeth in those grant guidance documents to ensure against proprietary features, such as Motorolas encryption. He said federal watchdogs have performed few compliance audits of state and local agencies.

It is rare that one company wields such power over a multibillion-dollar industry.

Motorola is, in practical terms, a monopoly, and they control the market for the purpose of keeping the pricing very high, said Jose Martin, president of Power Trunk, a subsidiary of Spains Teltronic, which is trying to break into the U.S. public-safety radio market.

Motorola stressed in its statement that it was an early participant in the 25-year-old industry-government effort to develop design standards, known as Project 25, or P25, that are supposed to open competition.

Martin has a different view. He contended Motorola pushed for P25 standards so that the U.S. wouldnt fall under Europes similar uniform manufacturing standard for emergency radios.

As a result, he Martin said, U.S. taxpayers are being exfoliated.

Overpaying for radios

In a 2011 report, the Government Accountability Office, warned that agencies may be overpaying for radios because they lack buying power in relationship to device manufacturers.

Eshoo said Motorolas grip on the radio market was a big reason behind her decision to co-author legislation enacted two years ago that allotted $7 billion for a nationwide, next-generation emergency data-delivery network she believes will invigorate competition.

If that broadband network someday reliably transmits voice communications, it would represent a huge threat to Motorola Solutions radio franchise, pitting the company against Verizon and AT&T.

Motorola has pushed back against the Commerce Departments new unit, known as FirstNet, which is overseeing the new network, drawing a public scolding from Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.

He lamented published reports that the company has secretly lobbied against the new network.

Motorola insists it supports the broadband network.

Montgomery County, Pa., a Philadelphia suburb, offers an example of the skyrocketing cost of emergency radios.

In 1996, the county bought a conventional radio system for less than $5 million. The cost of last years contract for a new digital system was $40 million over its 10-year life.

One former senior Motorola executive, who declined to be identified to avoid harming relationships, said everybody knows a cellphone costing a few hundred dollars is far more powerful than todays two-way emergency radios. He said public-safety agencies shouldnt be paying more than $800 for a ruggedized cellphone.

Rivals of Motorola also have learned agencies will choose it over cheaper radios that appear to pass all tests.

Karthik Rangarajan, marketing vice president for longtime rival EF Johnson, said a city or countys request for radio bids lands on his desk with the exact specifications for a Motorola product.

In cash-strapped Randolph County, N.C., EF Johnson bid $150,000 lower on a contract in 2011 with a package that included 200 more radios, but Motorola got the job. Rangarajan said there was a tipoff: Fire department officials forgot to remove the name Motorola from the specifications.

Communications During An Uprising From Zello To Walkie-Talkies In Venezuela And Ukraine

0

two way radio systemWhat will you do if i stated I had found a 2 way radio encryption piece that is not only fascinating but educational as well? I knew you would not believe me, so here it is the educational, excellent and interesting editorial

A protester, bloodied by a blow from a policeman’s club, needs to communicate to an organizer that the authorities have begun using force. A few blocks away, the organizer wipes tear gas from his eyes and wants to signal to his group to fall back. Rather than using shouts or even traditional walkie-talkies, both pull out their smartphones.

Welcome to modern civil disobedience: Rising up against your government? There’s an app for that.

Of all the available group chat apps, Zello is credited with helping protesters across the globe organize and communicate, much as Twitter and Facebook did during the Arab Spring in 2010. Zello was the most popular app on the App Store and Google Play for several days in Ukraine before it began topping the charts in Venezuela. Reports from sources from NPR to Quartz extolled its developers’ work to evade blocks put in place by Venezuela’s state-run mobile service provider.

Zello works like a walkie-talkie, allowing users to broadcast voice messages to groups using their smartphone’s data connection. It is used for many of the same tasks that walkie-talkies are, with a range as far as a phones data connection.

Zello Walkie Talkie App Protesters Venezuela
A demonstrator holds a placard as another takes a picture of the national guards during a protest near Cuba’s embassy in Caracas, Venezuela. Jorge Silva / Reuters
Launched in 2007, Zello is popular thanks to “the same qualities that have been popular with Walkie Talkie for organizing people and events,” Bill Moore, CEO of the Austin, Texas-based company, told International Business Times. “Participants don’t need their hands or eyes. The information is in real time, it works with small or large groups. And voice carries much more information than text.”

The media took notice of Zellos popularity in uprisings throughout Venezuela and Ukraine, especially after reports surfaced that the Venezuelan government began blocking the app last month. Ninety percent of Venezuelas Internet traffic is funneled through CANTV, a nationalized Internet and phone service.

Zellos chief technology officer and founder, Alexey Gravrilov, told IBTimes that CANTV first removed access to Zellos website from its servers, making the website and service inaccessible in Venezuela on Feb. 20. The following day, an updated version was submitted to Google and Apple that restored access for most users.

Until now, the updated app allowed us to unblock access in Venezuela every time we discover it’s blocked again, Gravrilov said. CANTV still keeps on trying to block it on a daily basis.

Gravrilov advises those affected to use a VPN, or virtual private network, to avoid blocks like those instituted by CANTV in Venezuela. VPNs are encryption services that hide the way a user accesses the Internet, allowing them to circumvent blocks, download files and visit Web pages without the knowledge of outside interests.

In one of the most popular Venezuelan channels used by protestors, Venezuela, users were looking for information about the results of clashes with police, attempting to confirm reports of protest-related activities, and in general searching for news about what was going on in protests around the country.

The following Zello broadcasts were translated from Spanish:

Here from Ecuador, we get no news from Venezuela, please inform, this is the only clean channel.

We need better information from the front at Miraflores [the presidential palace]. What is going on over there?

There have been no serious injuries in Isabelita. Five people to the hospital, but not serious.

Valencia… Any deaths? It looks terrible on TV, they are saying a child is dead, please confirm. (Someone later told the user that there had been no deaths recently. The next day, two civilians and a police officer were dead.)

Venezuela keeps on creeping up in the media, but all the info is manipulated, complained one user. They do not tell it like it is, there is no mention of tear gas or police brutality. Let’s tell it like it is.

Though Zello is particularly popular during early phases of protests, protesters often switch to other methods of communication once the situation intensifies. One Venezuelan protester who asked to be referred to only as Marlene told IBTimes that not too many people were continuing to use Zello on the front lines. Instead, she said, protesters had begun using encrypted chat apps and social media sites with privacy options that allow for greater protection against government entities.

There are spies that listen to the conversation and everything that is going on, she said. The government is listening, and many dont want to risk their freedom. This is why you can’t talk much or say much in Zello. It is much better to use Facebook groups instead.

For those who are worried about reprisal, such as Marlene, the open broadcast nature of Zello, where one user can broadcast a message to many others through channels, is also a weakness. While Zello allows users to create closed channels that require approval before people can join, the confusion and mass numbers involved with protests means that regulating those channels is difficult.

Moore told IBTimes that his company has also offered free Zello@Work to protest organizations because it is both fully encrypted and centrally managed. Unlike many other popular messaging apps, Zello is completely anonymous because it does not require a user to confirm his or her account with a phone number or email address.

Moore says that Zellos newfound popularity in protests has spurred the company to begin work on encryption for the free version for consumers. Twitter and Facebook did the same after their early use by organizers.

Ukraines Shift From Walkie Talkie Apps To The Real Thing

Protesters in Kievs Maidan Nezalezhnosti, or Independence Square, used Zello during the initial days of the Ukrainian uprising. As the protests escalated into violence, organizers switched to real walkie-talkies for most communications. Out of the 50 or so groups still camped out in the Maidan, all still have at least one or two people designated to use Zello.

Petro, a 28-year-old from Ternopil, says his group used one institutional account on Zello for updates on security, alerts, whether roads were open or closed, and the arrival of supplies, including food and medicine. It was important during the worst days of clashes but now is mostly idle. The groups also used personal Zello accounts for chatting and having private communications.

Petro mans one of the main entrances to the Maidan, off of the barricades on the slope of Institutska Street, by the Ukraina Hotel, a strategic location during the uprising. Petro said that groups switched to real walkie-talkies because reception and sound quality was poor on Zello.

Marian, age 25, from Lviv, Ukraine, used Zello regularly with his group, 30 or 40 people from Galits’ka Diviz’ya Sotnya Leva, a nationalist self-defense brigade from Western Ukraine. Marian used the app to communicate with other group members. Though they have since switched to walkie-talkies, he said the group began using Zello after it was advertised on Maidan.SOS, a network coordinating the rebellion effort, in December 2013.

One group that still uses Zello regularly is the information center of Spylno Sprava, a nonpolitical group at the Maidan. The Zello point person is Artem Polyshiuk, who estimates that some 30,000 people used the app during the Maidan rebellion. He said there were a number of channels, three of which were dedicated to AutoMaidan, a group of motorists who defended the Maidan and patrolled the periphery during the clashes with soldiers.

Zello Use Ukraine
A desktop version of Zello is used by a Ukrainian resistance group. The walkie-talkie app has helped protesters worldwide to coordinate efforts. Avedis Hadjian / International Business Times
According to Anna Pyatetska, a 21-year-old from Kiev, apps like Zello were used because smartphones were more readily available than standard walkie-talkies. Zello was used to organize protests as well as spread news about what was happening.

With time, [protest leaders] managed to get almost everything we needed, so people who really needed to communicate with each other got walkie talkies, Pyatetska said.

The men manning the roadblocks and other activists used a number of communication methods, including walkie-talkies, Zello, chat apps like Viber and WhatsApp, and standard phone calls and texts during the crisis.

Of course, a lot of info was generated through Facebook, Pyatetska said. Even lives were saved, thanks to posts from injured people who informed where they were and what was happening.

She said the groups now communicate mostly about their location and where they are headed. That way, if someone goes missing, at least they know where they can start their search. Finding lost people, especially in Crimea, is now a priority for volunteers like Pyatetska, who recently returned from studying in Switzerland and had hoped that joining the European Union would help the Ukrainian economy grow, as it did Polands when that country joined in 1996. But for now, communicating with her peers is the most important thing on her mind.

“We have an organization called Crimea.SOS, and they are basically trying to protect people, citizens of Crimea, and finding journalists, or activists who are missing because of the actions of the Russian army,” she said.

If you have any concerns pertaining to exactly where and how to use two way radio, you can speak to us at our own site.

Buyers Guide – Ham Radio Dual Band 2 Way Radios

0

The world is filled with really cool, well written content. Whenever you find one which catches your eye, you have got to post it, well i do! so with permission of the original writer i have posted this to take pleasure in

communication device used by stephen hawkingDayton Hamvention was a big help in this market when a seller setup and sold the Wouxun KG-UVD1P for an unbeliveable price of $75.00.
This dealer sold over 500 Walkie Talkies in 2 days. This was the start of the Low Cost Dual Band Ht craze.
Several dealers picked up on this sales boom including Hong Kong and China Companies selling on ebay at rock low prices. Hong Kong sellers starting selling these radios for about $5 above cost and because of their large numbers of sales and low prices, dealers in the US had to lower their prices to compete with them.

Now, 3 and 4 years later the sales craze is still going on but its changed some. Hong Kong sellers are still selling at low prices on ebay, US Sellers have raised their prices a little andnot trying to compete with the too low prices of Hong Kong and China sellers.
Buying at a low price is not always saving you money. When you buy from Hong Kong on ebay at the lowest price, you lack the support you reallyneed on these dual band radios. Should you have a problem, you need to send your radio back to Hong Kong, pay the shipping charges which is about $30 one way to Hong Kong and then pay the return shipping from Hong Kong to you.

You may as well toss your radio out and buy a new one, cost is too high to mess with it. One big advantage of buying from a US Dealer is support, when you need service there is no need to send it back to China, you just take care of the problem with the local dealer.
Most US Dealers will replace your radio should you have a problem, this can save you lots of money and give you piece of mind. Saving a few bucks can cost you more money in the future. Same with customer support on programming your Dualband radio, but from a US dealer and always have a way to talk with them on the phone to solve your problems.

Which Dual Band Ht should you buy? With many Chinese companies making these radios now, how do I know which is the best one to buy ? Because most of the Chinese radios are very close to the other brands being sold, some are the same radio just in a different case, most use the same computer control chip so in a way they are all the same.

You may find minor programming menu difference between the brands. If you will notice the menu voice is the same voice talking on most all radios shows you they are using the same chip.
QUALITY – There are 2 chips that are used in these radios, one is what they call the Triditional Chinese Chip and the Non Standard Cheaper Chip. The costs of the Triditional Chip is much higher then the non standard ship so the more expensive dual band ht’s have the better chip and the really low cost Walkie Talkies have the other chip.

The difference between the chips are quality, the Traditional Chip is much better, less intermod and the receiver is much better then on the cheaper chip. What it boils down to is the more you pay for the radio, the beter it is. Baofeng UV-3 and UV-5 use the cheaper chip, the TYT TH-UV3R which is a little more expensive then the Baofeng UV-3R uses the more expensive ship so their radio is a little more expensive but better too.

Wouxun, TYT, Cheidra and QuanSeng Radios use the better chips.
How to Choose your Dual Band Handheld – Its alot like buying a car, you either choose a little more expensive radio for better operation or choose a lower cost radio to save some money. Both qualities of radios are fine, its just what you like. When buying a car most people buy because of Looks and Design followed by color.

Same with Dual Band Handheld Radios, pick the style and looks you like and but it. Many differenet styles and most are around the same price. Some are easier to program by hand but keep in mind, the best way to program you Ht is via computer. This is 2012 and everything is computer controled.
Why spend time punching in the repeater freqs when you can bring it up on your computer and program everything is just a click of a button. Most Ht’s are easy to enter additional freqs by hand. The Chinese English version of their manuals are sometimes difficult to understand but on the internet you can join the forums and get all the help you need.

Many quick short menu quides are available for free on the internet.
I choose to purchase my Dual Band radio from Kight Radio & Electronics. website They are a US Dealer and support is as easy as a phone call. Any warranty work is provided by them if you purchased the radio from them. I have purchased several radios from them and had a problem with one of them and one call fixed the problem, they sent me a new radio to replace my problem one.

They didnt even wait to receive the broken one but sent me a new one the same day I called them. That is Customer Service. I am glad I purchased from them and now from Hong Kong.
Kight Radio also has an office in China and he always has the latest updated news on the newest radios hitting the market. He does ship some of the latest radios from China when he is there but most are shipped from the US Office in Oklahoma. Delivery is fast with them.

Kight Radio owner is married to a Chinese girl so they spend part of the year in China and the other pert in the USA. Its so nice having a direct China contact to learn the latest accurate information. I find most of the forum posts about the new radios are not always correct.
Kight Radio alos has a blog about the Chinese Dual band Radios at website

You can keep up with the latest information in the Newest Chinese Ham Radios there.
Hope this information helped you. Choose a radio you like, buy it and enjoy all the fun at a cost much lower then the major Ham Radio mfgs but be surprised, the proformance is just as good and sometimes better then the Yaesu,Icom and Kenwood expensive radios

Remember ! Spend just a little more and buy one from a US Dealer. Support is important when you need it. Buying from Hong Kong is a throw away radio should you have a problem.

Highly Accurate Radio Frequency Signal Generator

0

When we found this post we were so excited, having hunted for over one year for this, finding it on this site was an exciting day for me.

Toronto, Canada – GAO Instruments website released a CPU-controlled radio frequency signal generator operating over a frequency range of 300kHz to 300MHz.

It is commonly used in research and development and production testing of AM/FM receivers, civil-band transceivers, radio remote-controlled devices and wireless telephones.

This two Way Radio frequency signal generator, model A0400001, offers non-volatile RAM which can store a hundred samples of data. It features both an RS-232C and an IEEE-488 interface. The signal generator provides a highly stable time base to satisfy the most stringent requirements in terms of time base aging and accuracy.

The signal generator can be controlled remotely by a computer or other instruments. In open mode, its RF output is adjustable between -8dBμ and120dBμ at an accuracy of ±1.5dB. This generator consumes 35W maximum power.

GAO Instruments website ) is a global leader in research, development and manufacturing of high performance telecommunication testers, electronic measurement instruments and other test and measurement devices.

Toronto, Canada – GAO Instruments website released a CPU-controlled radio frequency signal generator operating over a frequency range of 300kHz to 300MHz. It is commonly used in research and development and production testing of AM/FM receivers, civil-band transceivers, radio remote -controlled devices and wireless telephones.

This radio frequency signal generator, model A0400001, offers non-volatile RAM which can store a hundred samples of data. It features both an RS-232C and an IEEE-488 interface. The signal generator provides a highly stable time base to satisfy the most stringent requirements in terms of time base aging and accuracy.

The signal generator can be controlled remotely by a computer or other instruments. In open mode, its RF output is adjustable between -8dBμ and120dBμ at an accuracy of ±1.5dB. This generator consumes 35W maximum power.

GAO Instruments website ) is a global leader in research, development and manufacturing of high performance telecommunication testers, electronic measurement instruments and other test and measurement devices.

Isle of Man to get two new 2 way radio transmitters

0

communication device macWithout giving too much about this two way radio companies piece of writing, but I thought it interesting and appropriate to what I’m now doing.

Two new digital radio (johnathanpavershoes.tumblr.com) transmitters are to be sited in the Isle of Man, the BBC has announced.

It is part of a move to bring the Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) service to 2.5 million people in the British Isles before the end of 2015.

A BBC spokesman said the transmitters will be co-sited with the existing television transmitters at Port St Mary and Ramsey.

The Isle of Man currently has one transmitter in Douglas.

The service will carry the BBC’s nationwide services; Radios 1 to 5 live, 1Xtra, 4 Extra, 5 live sports extra, 6 Music, Asian Network and World Service.

Cell Phone Towers and Mobile Phone Masts – Beacons of Harm

0

So i found this post on the web and i heard that just posting it as the whole piece isn’t a good thing, I got consent from the original author and read up how to curate posts, so that is it…….i thought this was fascinating as it highlights some of the highs and lows that I encountered when i was working inside the business.

2 way radio privacy codesIs it a cactus? A palm tree? A water tower? No! It’s a cell phone tower! That’s right! Cell phone towers today are being disguised in subtle ways unheard of just a few years ago. See a grain silo? Or a church steeple? You guessed it. It could very well be a cell phone tower. There’s even a cell phone tower that looks just like a lighthouse…never mind that it’s over two miles from the ocean.

But don’t let the pretty and ingenious disguises fool you. There is a real and present danger lurking behind the mask of these innocent designs.

Why the disguises? Obviously, for aesthetic reasons. The cell phone companies don’t want to make their neighborhood friends upset. They want to blend in. So they blend in while they blast your home and neighborhood with toxic electromagnetic radiation.

Cell phone towers, sometimes called masts, or mobile phone towers, weren’t an issue years ago when they were few and far between. One could often drive miles and miles through the countryside and never see one. They were few in number and were only found in obscure locations and seen only on an occasional hilltop. Today cell phone towers have increased dramatically in number. There are now more than 1.9 million cell phone towers and antenna towers spread throughout the U.S. They are now found on churches, schools and firehouses as well as being seen on the rooftop of buildings everywhere. Did you know there is even a cell phone tower near Old Faithful in Yellowstone Park? Can’t sleep well at night? It may be that there’s a cell phone tower close by.

Just why would a mobile phone tower be placed on a church, school or firehouse? Why would school boards and churches agree to this? Money. It’s that simple. The mobile phone companies will pay these organizations, and individual property owners, handsomely to install their equipment on their properties. This “rent money” can range from a few hundred dollars a month to several thousand dollars a month. What school district or church couldn’t use extra money to aid a struggling budget? By “renting” the space on an already-constructed building the cell phone industry doesn’t have to purchase land, build a tower or construct a new building. It simply mounts its equipment on a structure that already exists. It’s a win-win deal for the cell phone company and the new ‘landlord.’

Opposition to these cell tower installments used to gone unnoticed and without question. Not so today. Neighborhoods and citizens are becoming vocally opposed. But it’s not the esthetics that causes residents and property owners to oppose these structures. Communities and citizens are afraid of the potential health effects being caused by this technology as well as the adverse affect on property values.

We Can’t Stop Cell Phone Tower Construction

Unfortunately, there isn’t much one can do to stop the proliferation and continued build out of cell phone towers and structures. Although thought to be legislation about deregulation issues, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA) was really an open invitation for the cell phone industry to place their towers anywhere they wanted. Section 704 of the TCA basically states that local authorities can’t ban the placement of towers in their jurisdictions. The law says: “No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” So legally the local government can’t refuse the construction of a cell phone tower in your neighborhood! Any challenge by local communities could easily end up in federal court. Our lawmakers have basically given the cell phone industry free reign to install these towers wherever they want. And, by the way, the cell phone industry helped write this legislation that our government officials passed as law! The public, therefore, now has no voice and no vote. Is there something wrong with this picture? Why didn’t our public officials represent the people instead of big business? Why would you let the very industry you’re trying to regulate write it’s own laws?

Does the income outweigh the potential risks? It appears not. Scores of studies and well-respected research have exposed alarming health effects from various forms of cancer to stress. Many experts today are predicting an epidemic in brain cancer soon.

Representatives from the industry are quick to point out the microwaves emitted by cell phone towers are well below federal standards. And indeed they may be. At least on paper. Most towers operate at a power output of 100 watts. However, this isn’t the total wattage of the tower. What they aren’t telling you is that 100 watts is the power per channel. Since one tower may have dozens of channels you can see that the power output could be highly excessive and well beyond 100 watts. It’s a technical loophole. And, of course, who is monitoring the power output from these towers after they are erected? The FCC certainly isn’t. It doesn’t have the manpower or money to properly regulate the millions of towers and antennas now online. And who is to prevent these companies from turning up the wattage when no one is around? Some have reported that many of these towers have already shown power outputs in the 900 to 1000 watt range.

You Can’t Escape The Radiation. It’s Everywhere.

We simply can’t escape the exposure to this radiation. It’s everywhere. There are so many people using cell phones and wireless connections today that you don’t even have to own a cell phone to be exposed. You’re just as exposed as everyone else. Every time someone makes a call from a mobile phone the signal is sent to a cell phone tower. There are so many calls being made by everyone all around us and now there are so many mobile phone towers in operation, that all of us are caught in the crossfire. It’s like second-hand smoke from cigarettes, except that we can’t get away from it. There simply isn’t anywhere to escape.

How Mobile Phone Towers Work

Cell phone towers emit signals in a “flower petal” pattern around the tower. This 360-degree radius around the tower is called a “cell” and this is what the term “cell” in cell phone means. When your phone is in a “cell” you get good reception and when it isn’t in a?”cell” you get poor reception. So, for a cell phone company to provide complete coverage cell phone towers and antenna towers must be positioned all across the country so that the “cells” overlap. You can begin to see what a huge infrastructure needs to be created to provide complete cell phone coverage. That’s why cell phone towers and antenna towers are so prevalent. Furthermore, that’s why these antennas are installed in so many places like rooftops, fire stations, schools and churches. This is what is necessary for complete coverage.

Studies Show Adverse Health Effects From Cell Phone Towers

If you aren’t sure that cell phone towers and masts are harmful the following study summaries should convince you. Below are listed six studies that have shown significant adverse health effects on people living near cell phone towers. According to Dr. Grahame Blackwell “these are the only studies known that specifically consider the effects of masts on people. All six studies show clear and significant ill-health effects. There are no known studies relating to health effects of masts that do not show such ill-health effects.”

Santini et al. found significant health problems in people living within 300 meters of a cell phone base station or tower. The recommendation was made from the study that cell phone base stations should not be placed closer than 300 meters to populated areas. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2002; 50: 369-373.
A Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research study entitled, “Effects of Global Communications System 2 Way Radio-Frequency Fields On Well Being and Cognitive Function of Human Subjects With and Without Subjective Complaints” found significant effects on well being including headaches, muscle fatigue, pain, and dizziness from tower emissions well below the “safety” level.
Gerd, Enrique, Manuel, Ceferino and Claludio conducted a Spanish study called “The Microwave Syndrome” and found adverse health effects from those living near two cell phone base stations. The health effects included fatigue, a tendency toward depression, sleeping disorders, difficulty in concentration and cardiovascular problems.
From an Israeli study published in the International Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 1, No. 2, April 2004, Wolf and Wolf reported a fourfold increase in the incidence of cancer in people living within 350 meters of a cell phone tower as compared to the Israeli general population. They also reported a tenfold increase specifically among women.
In the Naila Study from Germany, November 2004, five medical doctors collaborated to assess the risk to people living near a cell phone tower. The retrospective study was taken from patient case histories between 1994 and 2004 from those who had lived during the past ten years at a distance up to 400 meters from the tower site. The results showed that the proportion of newly developed cancer cases was significantly higher in those patients living within the 400-meter distance and that the patients became ill on average eight years earlier. In the years 1999 to 2004, after five years of operation of the transmitting tower, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebled for residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared to the inhabitants of Naila outside the area.
An Austrian Study released in May 2005, showed that radiation from a cell phone tower at a distance of 80 meters causes significant changes of the electrical currents in the brains of test subjects. All test subjects indicated they felt unwell during the radiation and some reported being seriously ill. According to the scientists doing the study, this is the first worldwide proof of significant changes of the electrical currents in the brain, as measured by EEG, by a cell phone base station at a distance of 80 meters. Subjects reported symptoms such as buzzing in the head, tinnitus, palpitations of the heart, lightheadedness, anxiety, shortness of breath, nervousness, agitation, headache, heat sensation and depression. According to scientists this is the first proof that electrical circuits in the brain are significantly affected by a cell phone tower. The distance in this study was a mere 80 meters.
Two-time Nobel Prize nominee Dr. Gerald Hyland, a physicist, had this to say about mobile phone towers. “Existing safety guidelines for cell phone towers are completely inadequate. Quite justifiably, the public remains skeptical of attempts by governments and industry to reassure them that all is well, particularly given the unethical way in which they often operate symbiotically so as to promote their own vested interests.”

Dr. Bruce Hocking did a study in Syndey, Australia, of children living near TV and FM broadcast towers, which by the way, are very similar to cell phone towers. He found that these children had more than twice the rate of leukemia as children living more than seven miles away from these towers.

Results in yet another recent study conducted on inhabitants living near or under a mobile phone base station antenna yielded the following prevalence of neuropsychiatric complaints: headache (23.5%), memory changes (28.2%), dizziness (18.8%), tremors (9.4%), depressive symptoms (21.7%), and sleep disturbances(23.5%). In this study the participants were given a neurobehavioral test battery measuring such things as problem solving, visuomotor speed, attention andmemory. Symptoms of exposed inhabitants were significantly higher than control groups.

Furthermore, Europe’s top environmental watchdog group, European Environment Agency (EEA), is calling for immediate action to reduce exposure to mobile phone masts. EEA suggests action to reduce exposure immediately to vulnerable groups such as children.

The development of brain tumors in staff members working in a building in Melbourne, Australia, prompted the closing of the top floors of the building. The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology is housed in the building. Seven staff members were diagnosed with brain tumors and five of the seven worked on the top floor. A cell phone antenna is located on the roof of the building.

The Orange phone company in England is being forced to remove its mast tower on a building in Bristol, England. The removal is a result of a five-year effort by residents and local authorities to have the mast removed. Cancer rates in the building, which has become known internationally as the “Tower of Doom,” have soared to ten times the national average for the 110 residents living there. The two masts sitting on the roof, one owned by Orange and the other by Vodafone, were installed in 1994. Vodafone has refused the remove its mast.

Cell Phone Towers Affect Animals

Animals aren’t exempt from exposure the cell phone tower radiation either. One veterinary school in Hanover, Germany, reports that dairy cows kept in close proximity to a cell phone tower for two years had a reduction in milk production in addition to other health problems including abnormal behavior patterns.

Firefighters Vote To Suspend Cell Tower Construction On Fire Stations

Concerned about the effect that masts have on the nation’s firefighters, The International Association of Fire Fighters voted in 2004 to voice its opposition to cell phone towers and antennas being place on and around fire stations. They want proof first that there isn’t a safety issue and have asked for a moratorium on further construction and placement of any more towers or antennas on or around firehouses until such a study can be conducted.

What Are These Antennas Doing To Our Kids While They’re In School?’t worth the risk. They should not be subjected to microwave radiation when science has proven there could clearly be devastating effects as outlined in the previously mentioned studies. School boards and parent organizations need to be aware of the inherent dangers from such an exposure. It’s been clearly shown that microwave radiation penetrates the head of a child much easier than that of an adult. This is due to the thinner and softer bones in the head of child. Skull bones don’t fully harden until about age 22.

How Many Cell Phone Towers Are Near You?

The average person lives within one-half mile of a cell phone tower. Have you ever wondered how close you live or work to one of these towers? Would it bother you if one were right in your backyard? How many of these towers and antennas do you think there are in your immediate area? Find out by visiting the website http://www.antennasearch.com/. Simply type in your address and you’ll get a listing and a map of all the towers and antennas within a short radius of your address. Like most people you’ll probably gasp when you see the numbers. These towers are literally everywhere. Hundreds and hundreds of them are probably located within a few miles of your home or office.

Watch The Signal Bars On Your Cell Phone

The signal bars on your cell phone tell you how strong the signal is that are connecting to your cell phone. In other words, the closer you are to a cell phone tower the stronger the signal. The stronger the signal the less power your phone has to use to maintain the connection. A strong signal is indicated by a full set of “bars” showing on your cell phone display. Fewer bars mean a weaker signal. A weaker signal means the cell phone has to work harder to maintain the signal. Consequently, more power is needed to maintain the connection. The more power needed the greater the amount of radiation produced by your phone and the greater exposure to you. So always try to talk in outdoors or in an open space. This allows an easier connection from your cell phone to the nearest cell phone tower. Your phone won’t have to work as hard and less power is used to maintain the signal, which translates, to less radiation exposure for you.

What Can We Do?

Obviously, can’t escape the exposure. We’ve established that fact. So what can we do to minimize the damage?

Here are few ideas: We need to limit our exposure any way possible. Don’t live near a cell phone tower if you have a choice. Don’t buy a home near one even if the price is right. Limit your use of wireless devices. Go back to ‘wired’ connections whenever possible. Maximize your health through proper nutrition and good hydration. Eat foods high in antioxidants and take supplements. Eat organically as much as possible. There is no safe distance to locate away from a mast tower. Obviously, the closer to the tower the greater the exposure risk so do locate as far away as possible. Whenever possible encourage your local government officials to consider transitioning to the use of fiber optic cable. Most of it has already been laid underground. It’s just not being used. There are no masts with fiber optics and the small amount of radiation at the exits can be neutralized with technology now available. Discourage the use of Wi-Fi in schools by meeting with your school officials and school boards. Wi-Fi hotspots are popping up everywhere now. Even whole cities are going wireless with the installation of Wi-Fi. Again, it’s all done through a wireless signal, which is damaging to your health. Don’t let cell phone companies install cell phone antennas on the roofs of schools where your children attend. The radio waves are disruptive to their ability to focus, not to mention the health hazards we’ve already outlined. If you can’t change your current situation there is some hope. There are some intervention devices now available that you can use in your home, school and office to help lessen the risk of exposure. Some very good cutting-edge technology has been developed that will intervene and help mitigate the damage being done by wireless connections.